justcycling.myfastforum.org Forum Index justcycling.myfastforum.org
Just Cycling
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   Join! (free) Join! (free)  
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Sticky Articles
2013 Season
The Cobblestone Fantasy Cycling League
The NRT Fantasy League
Cycling on TV & Internet
Smarauder trophy 2013
The Cycling Revealed Trivia Quiz 2012-2013
JustCycling's New Net Biking Biblioteca
2013 Fearless Prediction Calendar
Question the person below and answer the question above
Scoring rules for Smarauder Memorial trophy
Popular Topics
The Battles of the Ardennes: April 10th-21st, 2013
Giro 2013: The Antipasti Stages-May 8th-12th.
Giro 2013: I Secondi Piatti Stages:- May 18th - May 22nd
Il Grande Giro Aperitivo 2013 - Tappe Prima: May 4th-May 7th
Giro D'Italia 2013. News, Previews Teams etc etc
Paris-Roubaix: 7th April 2013
Giro 2013: I Primi Piatti Stages - May 14th-17th
Driedaagse De Panne-Koksijde and Ronde van Vlaanderen 2013
Top posters
HuwB 11754
Bartali 11561
kathy 11526
CapeRoadie 10122
Mrs John Murphy 7975
Slapshot 3 5904
Biosphere 5509
smarauder68 5365
Sooty 4913
Nolte 4829
bianchigirl 4666
cardinal guzman 4659
Ralphnorman 4323
crash48 4283
SlowRower 4058
cyclingtv 3853
Fontfroide 3759
sheeponabike 3724
last km 3593
bbnaz 3518
naspa 3506
Boogerd_Fan 3205
mr shifter 3084
berck 3031
kellyrocheearly 2972
Pellizotti to Quit Cycling
Page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    justcycling.myfastforum.org Forum Index -> Cycling Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Slapshot 3
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 5904


Location: Scotland

PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 5:12 am    Post subject: Pellizotti to Quit Cycling Reply with quote

From CN.....

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/d...lizotti-says-hes-quitting-cycling

Quote:
Banned Italian hits out at "poorly managed" UCI

Following the Court of Arbitration for Sport's decision to uphold an appeal by the UCI to ban Franco Pellizotti for two years, the Italian claims he wants "nothing more of cycling".

In an interview with Spanish cycling website Ciclismo a Fondo, Pellizotti has hit out at the sport's governing body claiming it's "poorly managed, with the leadership continuing to do what they want, applying rules as they wish."

Pellizotti was identified as a rider of interest by the UCI's Biological Passport before last year's Giro d'Italia but was then cleared by the Italian Olympic Committee in October.

The man known as ‘Il Delfino' says at that point in proceedings, he believed that the matter would be dropped.

"I'm disappointed with the sport and with justice," he said. "I do not accept this penalty, but what I can do? This is the cycle... The leaders do what they want and will continue because they are allowed to do so. They are powerful, very strong and nobody says anything against them. I just cannot do anything."

Pellizotti's legal team had requested an urgent verdict and the arbitrators took just five days to reach their decison. His ban is expected to last until May 2012. Fellow Italian Pietro Caucchioli was also given a ban, with CAS confirming the two-year suspension issued by the Italian Olympic Committee.

As an extra penalty, CAS has cancelled all of Pelizotti's results from May 17, 2009. He will lose his second place at the Giro d'Italia (he finished third but Danilo Di Luca was subsequently disqualified for doping), his stage victory at the Tour de France and his king of the mountains jersey. He has also been fined 115,000 Euro.

The 33-year-old says he is now walking away from the sport.

"I leave it all, I don't want to know anything more of cycling," Pellizotti said. "Not because of my age or for the time, even though it's two years, it's because I am tired."

_________________
S Marauder Memorial Trophy Winner 2009, 2012
Cycling Revealed Trivia Quiz/Just Cycling Winner 2010

Superlance now has the same number of Tour titles as me
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HuwB



Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 11754


Location: Deep in the Black Mountains.

PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 9:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Big discussion on the TAS ruling from the Rai team in last night's pre Tirreno show.
Not a happy bunch. Much of their venom was directed at Contador.
The "great injustice" being that Pellizotti had got the boot without failing a test,
yet Bertie is riding around, winning races, probably doing the Giro, having failed a test.
Spain also got a special mention, in comparison to Italian efforts.

Not surprised that Franco is walking away. What amounts to a 3 year ban, big fine etc. pointless to wait around to ride a season or two at a lower level. Better to find employment and start paying the bills.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Biosphere
Site Admin


Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Posts: 5509


Location: Der Schweiz

PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 9:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Contador had better be careful

As an extra penalty, CAS has cancelled all of Pelizotti’s results from May 17, 2009.

That's a 3 year ban! They were watching him for the best part of a year before they told him.

I don't know what to think regarding the passport, but I think it probably works for those that can't afford good "consultants", but for those that can afford the advice, it may well be a useful tool for keeping an exemplary profile. I do think trying to attack the science is probably a flawed defence strategy when scientists are the jury. Not saying they'll get it right and if you believe you're innocent then it's all you can attack, but . . .

The two outstanding passport cases will be interesting to see how they go.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mrs John Murphy



Joined: 18 Aug 2007
Posts: 7975


Location: Stepping on Cadel's dog

PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 3:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I wonder what kind of reaction Dertie will get from the fans on the road if he does turn up in Italy.

While the UK press is pretty silent when it comes to criticising the Dertie case, (has Harmon even mentioned it?), the ES feed I've been listening to has spent a lot of time discussing and criticising the Spanish authorities.

Does FP have to repay his prize money?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kathy



Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 11526


Location: Formerly Hen Wlad fy Nhadau, now, Oliva, Valencia, Spain

PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 3:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

HuwB wrote:
i
Spain also got a special mention, in comparison to Italian efforts.
.


Buat the Italians cleared Pellizotti! Rolling Eyes  Rolling Eyes  Rolling Eyes
_________________
"You can't win races with passion alone."

Fabian Cancellara (2008)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mrs John Murphy



Joined: 18 Aug 2007
Posts: 7975


Location: Stepping on Cadel's dog

PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 3:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

And so what? Despite being 'cleared' he wasn't allowed to ride, unlike your boy who is having the red carpet laid out for him.

I didn't see the Italian prime minister tweeting that FP was innocent.

Spare me the Spanish victimhood.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SlowRower



Joined: 22 Nov 2006
Posts: 4058


Location: 62 West Wallaby Street, Wigan

PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 3:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

MJM - Are you aware of the specific reason why FP wasn't riding despite being cleared by his national Federation? I don't know if you're asking because you don't know or as a debating tactic!

Was FP suspended by his team, for example? Obviously, Berto's not going to be suspended by his team, because he is the team to all intents and purposes.

Or do the Italians maintain suspensions even for riders they'v cleared until the appeals process has run its course?

Or are "passport" offences different in the rule book vs normal test failures in that the affected rider is suspended by the UCI until the appeals process is complete.

etc

There is certainly a difference in FP's and Berto's treatment, and it would be interesting to know who has been preventing FP riding since being originally cleared.
_________________
You don't like cheese? Not even Wensleydale?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mrs John Murphy



Joined: 18 Aug 2007
Posts: 7975


Location: Stepping on Cadel's dog

PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 3:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't know the reason, other than the fact that one set of riders are Spanish and the others are non-Spanish riders.

You can contrast the way that FP, TV etc have been treated after being 'cleared' and the way in which Dertie and Piti were treated.

As I recall FP was sacked by Leaky after being banned initially and wasn't hired despite being 'cleared' the same goes for TV.

Meanwhile, Piti is allowed to train with his team while banned (against UCI rules) while Dertie is welcomed with open arms.

It seems pretty clear that there are rules and attitudes towards doping in Europe and North America, and then there are Iberian rules and attitudes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Biosphere
Site Admin


Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Posts: 5509


Location: Der Schweiz

PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 3:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SlowRower wrote:
. . .  and it would be interesting to know who has been preventing FP riding since being originally cleared.


AFAIK, it's a mix of Liquigas originally pulling him from racing, the CONI ban, Liquigas letting his contract lapse, and presumably no team willing to take him on to their roster this year whilst CAS appeal pending. If he had Contador's profile then something like this might have been more likely.

http://nyvelocity.com/content/toto/2011/toto-turns-221
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SlowRower



Joined: 22 Nov 2006
Posts: 4058


Location: 62 West Wallaby Street, Wigan

PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 4:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting - Whilst there are differences in the appraoches of different Federations, the key difference here appears to be that FP was considered expendable by Leaky whereas Bert and Valverde weren't by their teams.
_________________
You don't like cheese? Not even Wensleydale?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Slapshot 3
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 5904


Location: Scotland

PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 4:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Biosphere wrote:
SlowRower wrote:
. . .  and it would be interesting to know who has been preventing FP riding since being originally cleared.


AFAIK, it's a mix of Liquigas originally pulling him from racing, the CONI ban, Liquigas letting his contract lapse, and presumably no team willing to take him on to their roster this year whilst CAS appeal pending. If he had Contador's profile then something like this might have been more likely.

http://nyvelocity.com/content/toto/2011/toto-turns-221


There are differences between Berto and Pellizotti's treatment and I suggest it's more to do with the passport than anything else. The UCI could not afford to see a passport case fail at any level that was why they had to appeal the quashing of it by the Italians. The passport has been the UCI's flagship and if they can't guarantee prosecution with it then it's pointless, even fat Pat McTwat understands that one. This gives it a significant boost, Franco is no pointless Domestique.

Contadors case on the other hand was a positive for a specific drug that obviously has not shown up on the passport therefore McTwat can do everything he wants to hush it up, ignore it and demand payment in kind.  

I would hope and suspect that if Contador's case had been passport related he would be hammered the same as anyone else and if it had been passport related there would be bugger all RFEC could have done.
_________________
S Marauder Memorial Trophy Winner 2009, 2012
Cycling Revealed Trivia Quiz/Just Cycling Winner 2010

Superlance now has the same number of Tour titles as me
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Biosphere
Site Admin


Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Posts: 5509


Location: Der Schweiz

PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 4:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SlowRower wrote:
Interesting - Whilst there are differences in the appraoches of different Federations, the key difference here appears to be that FP was considered expendable by Leaky whereas Bert and Valverde weren't by their teams.


Well he's older and they have the new generation of Nibali, Sagan and Oss and the 2nd coming of Basso. Team manager's public statement was that there wasn't room for him in team. I'm sure the other stuff didn't help.

Regarding national attitudes. Riis isn't Spanish and Zomnegan seems happy enough to have Contador race cos he wants the profile for the Giro. As Mr. S keeps reminding us, it's all about the . . .
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SlowRower



Joined: 22 Nov 2006
Posts: 4058


Location: 62 West Wallaby Street, Wigan

PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 5:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Slapshot 3 wrote:
There are differences between Berto and Pellizotti's treatment and I suggest it's more to do with the passport than anything else.


I'd have to disagree here. Both were cleared by their national feds, so were free to race, but in order to race, you need a team to pick you.

The difference is that FP's team stood him down, whereas Berto's didn't. FP was free to race from a legal perspective, but his team didn't want him to.

If the UCI don't appeal Berto's case then we could sensibly conclude that the passport is more important to the UCI than a "humble" test failure. (I guess the suspicious aspect of Bert's failure couldn't form part of a legal case, as the link to a transfusion is sketchy from a legal viewpoint.)
_________________
You don't like cheese? Not even Wensleydale?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SlowRower



Joined: 22 Nov 2006
Posts: 4058


Location: 62 West Wallaby Street, Wigan

PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 5:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="Biosphere:180949"]
SlowRower wrote:
Well he's older and they have the new generation of Nibali, Sagan and Oss and the 2nd coming of Basso. Team manager's public statement was that there wasn't room for him in team. I'm sure the other stuff didn't help.

Regarding national attitudes. Riis isn't Spanish and Zomnegan seems happy enough to have Contador race cos he wants the profile for the Giro. As Mr. S keeps reminding us, it's all about the . . .


Indeed. FP's real crime is to be too old and not fast enough. Unforgiveable in a team packed with stars, unfortunately
_________________
You don't like cheese? Not even Wensleydale?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Slapshot 3
Site Admin


Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 5904


Location: Scotland

PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 5:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SlowRower wrote:
Slapshot 3 wrote:
There are differences between Berto and Pellizotti's treatment and I suggest it's more to do with the passport than anything else.


I'd have to disagree here. Both were cleared by their national feds, so were free to race, but in order to race, you need a team to pick you.

The difference is that FP's team stood him down, whereas Berto's didn't. FP was free to race from a legal perspective, but his team didn't want him to.

If the UCI don't appeal Berto's case then we could sensibly conclude that the passport is more important to the UCI than a "humble" test failure. (I guess the suspicious aspect of Bert's failure couldn't form part of a legal case, as the link to a transfusion is sketchy from a legal viewpoint.)


As Bio suggests Liquigas have a vast store of superstars to pick from so doing the "right thing" for them was easy.

Both feds cleared them but the UCI response was instant in Franco's case they were appealing no matter what. The UCI are being selective and the passport is key to what they are doing
_________________
S Marauder Memorial Trophy Winner 2009, 2012
Cycling Revealed Trivia Quiz/Just Cycling Winner 2010

Superlance now has the same number of Tour titles as me
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SlowRower



Joined: 22 Nov 2006
Posts: 4058


Location: 62 West Wallaby Street, Wigan

PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 5:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Slapshot 3 wrote:
Both feds cleared them but the UCI response was instant in Franco's case they were appealing no matter what. The UCI are being selective and the passport is key to what they are doing


Didn't know the UCI appealed FP's case immediately. Agree, therefore that Passport irregularities are more important to UCI than other violations.

How about this for a conspiracy then...

Leaky and the UCI in cahoots - Expendable FP thrown to the wolvesby Leaky  in exchange for other Leaky riders not having their passports examined too closely by the UCI.

The UCI looks tough. Leaky look tough. Leaky's younger heavy artillery keep performing and everyone is happy. Except Franco.
_________________
You don't like cheese? Not even Wensleydale?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mrs John Murphy



Joined: 18 Aug 2007
Posts: 7975


Location: Stepping on Cadel's dog

PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 6:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So where does this leave say TV at AG2R who has also been cleared but is unable to ride.

BTW can anyone remember at what point Disco sacked Basso?

Bio - Riis may not be Spanish but his own reputation when it comes to doping and having dopers on his teams shows that he is not that bothered when it comes to the rules.

AZ is an odd one - he was willing to bend over backwards for the Uniballer and then got very cross over the annulled stage.

I suspect that if the UCI/WADA don't appeal then we will start seeing every national fed say 'what is good for the goose is good for the gander' and will start acquitting everyone no matter how spurious their stories are.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Boogerd_Fan



Joined: 07 Oct 2006
Posts: 3205


Location: Bratislava, Slovakia

PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 8:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Looks like they found their 'big name' scapegoat, after we all laughed at the relative unknown nature of the first set of named riders caught on the passport featured no-one in particular...
_________________
Has the new Boogie arrived??
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nolte



Joined: 15 Oct 2006
Posts: 4829


Location: irlande

PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 8:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mrs John Murphy wrote:


BTW can anyone remember at what point Disco sacked Basso?



i think April 2007
_________________
Hi
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Biosphere
Site Admin


Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Posts: 5509


Location: Der Schweiz

PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 9:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mrs John Murphy wrote:
So where does this leave say TV at AG2R who has also been cleared but is unable to ride.


Waiting. He is the yet to be CASsed passport case I mentioned above.

Mrs John Murphy wrote:
BTW can anyone remember at what point Disco sacked Basso?


When CONI reopened investigation and he fessed up immediately.

Mrs John Murphy wrote:
Bio - Riis may not be Spanish but his own reputation when it comes to doping and having dopers on his teams shows that he is not that bothered when it comes to the rules.


That's the point I'm making. Lines on a map don't always demarcate attitudes to doping.

Mrs John Murphy wrote:
AZ is an odd one - he was willing to bend over backwards for the Uniballer and then got very cross over the annulled stage.


Probably because TUE was then becoming a bigger story that the Giro

Mrs John Murphy wrote:
I suspect that if the UCI/WADA don't appeal then we will start seeing every national fed say 'what is good for the goose is good for the gander' and will start acquitting everyone no matter how spurious their stories are.


They have to appeal - strict liability is finished if they don't.

Boogerd Fan wrote:
Looks like they found their 'big name' scapegoat, after we all laughed at the relative unknown nature of the first set of named riders caught on the passport featured no-one in particular...


I wonder if that comes back to the point I made above, that "smaller" riders are less likely to have the medical backing to manipulate their passport numbers. I read that attention is now turning to looking for evidence of blood withdrawal rather than re infusion as the perturbations to the blood parameters are harder to mask on withdrawal.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    justcycling.myfastforum.org Forum Index -> Cycling Forum All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Card File  Gallery  Forum Archive
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group